The role of metagenomics in the fight against
multidrug resistant pathogens
Introduction: We now live in a so called “post-antibiotic era”,
what means that we can’t no longer rely on the great service antibiotics gave
us during the past decades. Medicine and science are now at a point where
antibiotic resistance building among bacteria is faster than the discovery of
new antibiotics. It’s urgent to understand the antibiotic resistance genes and
mechanisms and/or find new organisms which will produce new antibiotics.
(Fouhy, et al., 2015)
Development of resistant bacteria – role of
soil: Antibiotics
originally derive from products produced by microorganisms – mostly soil
bacteria (Fouhy, et al., 2015). It’s obvious that if they produce antibiotics
to fight each other there will also resistances be built for defence. It's
not yet clearly proven that resistance genes are given from soil bacteria to
clinical bacteria or vice-versa. But an investigation made by Forsberg et al.
(2012, found in de Castro et al., 2014) showed that a cultured non-pathogenic
soil bacteria was able to confer seven resistance genes which had exactly the
same nucleotide identity as resistance genes isolated from pathogens in
clinics.
The soil environment is of such a huge interest because it’s the habitat of an enormous amount of microorganisms and as described above soil bacteria contain very similar resistance genes like human pathogens.
The soil environment is of such a huge interest because it’s the habitat of an enormous amount of microorganisms and as described above soil bacteria contain very similar resistance genes like human pathogens.
Former methods to study antibiotic resistances:
Firstly the microorganisms
had to come to the seen-world. That happened when the microscope was invented
and life cycles of bacteria could be observed. The standard technique in
microbiology laboratories was to cultivate the tiny organisms. At that time the
challenge was to find the appropriate culture medium and to receive a pure
culture. Only culturable organisms could be examined while the uncultured life
wasn’t meant to exist. That changed in the mid-1980s, when scientists no longer
could neglect the uncultured microorganisms and started to develop new
techniques. (Handelsman, 2004)
Metagenomics – today’s most applied methods: Such a culture-independent analyse
technique is metagenomics (de Castro et al., 2014). To understand antibiotic
mechanisms and how resistance genes work is very important to predict and
foresee novel antibiotic resistances. Metagenomics helps to detect active and
inactive resistance genes whereof the latter also could confer resistance in
certain circumstances. (Pehrsson et al., 2013 found in de Castro et al., 2014)
The big advantages of the culture-independence of metagenomics are the in situ investigations of bacterial resistance mechanisms (de Castro et al., 2014) and the access to environmental niches that have been inaccessible (Fouhy, 2015).
Fouhy et al. (2015) suggest to couple functional metagenomics with proteomics, because functional metagenomics on its own is not able to detect a resistance phenotype when several genes are coding for one resistance. Proteomics does not identify genes but proteins resulting from transcripts translation (Gupta et al., 2007 found in Fouhy et al., 2015). And proteins are the real warriors against antibiotics.
The big advantages of the culture-independence of metagenomics are the in situ investigations of bacterial resistance mechanisms (de Castro et al., 2014) and the access to environmental niches that have been inaccessible (Fouhy, 2015).
Fouhy et al. (2015) suggest to couple functional metagenomics with proteomics, because functional metagenomics on its own is not able to detect a resistance phenotype when several genes are coding for one resistance. Proteomics does not identify genes but proteins resulting from transcripts translation (Gupta et al., 2007 found in Fouhy et al., 2015). And proteins are the real warriors against antibiotics.
Risk of a novel resistance gene in a metagenome
library: I would
rather see it as a chance if a novel resistance gene occurs in a metagenome
library, because this library is built up by researchers who are examining the
vast unknown uncultured world. I assume that the novel resistance gene already
existed and is now known and can be investigated. It’s no longer an unknown ‘enemy’.
But if it’s really novel novel and didn’t exist before then it’s a concerning
sign of further bacterial adaptation to antibiotics.
Literature:
de Castro, A. P.,
Fernandes, G., & Franco, O. L. (2014). Insights into novel
antimicrobial compounds and antibiotic resistance genes from soil metagenomes. frontiers in
Microbiology.
Fouhy, F., Stanton,
C., Cotter , P. D., Hill, C., & Walsh, F. (2015). Proteomics as the
final step in the functional metagenomics study of antimicrobial resistance.
frontiers in Microbiology.
Handelsman, J.
(2004). Metagenomics: Application of Genomics to Uncultured Microorganisms.
American Society for
Microbiology.
Hey Anna
AntwortenLöschenYour blog entry is very interesting and carefully researched. However, I would enjoy a picture, graph or something to visualise your text a bit. It's a very long entry, therefore it would be easier to read and more animating with a diagram or something similar in it.
See you soon.
Dominique
Hey Anna
AntwortenLöschenI like your blog entry a lot. It is a great idea to write a introduction, so "ignoramus" people could get a clue what this blog entry is about.
It would have been great to know what other methods were used to study antibiotic resistance, than metagenomics and what their advantages and disadvantages are.
Regards
Tamara
Dear Anna
AntwortenLöschenThank you for your really good blog. It‘s so interesting to see that different isolated non-pathogenic soil bacteria has the same nucleotide identity as resistance genes isolated from clinical pathogens. Riesenfeld et al. (2004) said that most of the soil bacteria couldn‘t be cultivated so that a vast number of bacteria resistances haven‘t yet been characterized. I guess there will be more similarities than we already are known. Did you know that genes for antibiotic resistance are often clustered with genes for antibiotic biosynthesis? Riesenfeld et. al. (2004) couldn‘t see that in his study but he mentioned it. So metagenomics could also be a chance to find potential novel antibiotics.
Have a good weekend,
Sarah
Literature
Riesenfeld, Ch. S.; Goodman, R. M. & Handelsman, J. (2004). Uncultered soil bacteria are a reservoir of new antibiotic resistance genes. Environmental Microbiology. 6(9). p. 981-989
Hi Anna
AntwortenLöschenYou hit a spot, and a good one. Metagenomics is the tool to find novel resistances that are already present in soil, and that can get problematic. Well, only if you do functional metagenomics, you can also determine its function. You still need to sequence afterwards, but that is much less work.
You mastered this difficult assignment with bravour! I am curious how you can put this bulk of novel acquired knowledge into a good panel discussion.
Regards
Theo